High Risk Health Insurance

Obama And Pelosi Buy Health Insurance Or Go To Jail!

YES WE CAN! REAL HOPE FOR AMERICA!
http://campaignforliberty.com

Duration : 0:1:41


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

25 Responses to “Obama And Pelosi Buy Health Insurance Or Go To Jail!”

  1. kubush says:

    @kababayanC2 You’re …
    @kababayanC2 You’re right. They don’t have to buy it. They can opt out and pay more in income tax instead.

  2. kubush says:

    @kababayanC2 Nancy …
    @kababayanC2 Nancy Pelosi can say that she is a magical fairy that is going to rid us all of evil. It doesn’t matter what Pelosi says, it matters what is in the bill. Regardless, there is no video where she says that you will serve jail time for not having insurance.

  3. kababayanC2 says:

    @kubush

    So? …
    @kubush

    So? Even if they can afford it, IT’S THEIR CHOICE! The government cannot force people to buy it!

  4. kababayanC2 says:

    @kubush Oh it’s …
    @kubush Oh it’s backed up. You can tell because Nancy Pelosi said so. (look up the video!) it’s may be in your related videos section!

  5. kubush says:

    @kababayanC2 So you …
    @kababayanC2 So you don’t have an actual legitimate source for your claims. Back up your statements or stop spreading misinformation.

  6. kababayanC2 says:

    @kubush

    I …
    @kubush

    I cannot read all 6000 pages of the bill, but there are videos proving that Obama and his cronies support this, like Nancy Pelosi. Just look it up.

  7. kubush says:

    @kababayanC2 In …
    @kababayanC2 In addition the bill requires those who CAN afford it to purchase it. Those who can’t would qualify for Medicare or subsidies.

  8. kubush says:

    @kababayanC2 No, …
    @kababayanC2 No, the video cites what could happen if you don’t pay the tax, not what happens if you dont have insurance.

  9. kubush says:

    @kababayanC2 Sorry …
    @kababayanC2 Sorry try again. The section you referenced to says that any person that willfully evades paying the TAXES is subject to these fines and imprisonment, and NOT due to not having insurance. This goes for ANY taxes as you should be aware of. Again, you claimed that you would go to prison for not having insurance. Please provide the section in the HC bill says that.

  10. kababayanC2 says:

    @kubush

    Here it …
    @kubush

    Here it is:

    H.R. 3962 section 7201 and H.R. 3962 section 7203

  11. kababayanC2 says:

    @kubush It clearly …
    @kubush It clearly shows in the video. WATCH IT.

  12. kubush says:

    @kababayanC2 Really …
    @kababayanC2 Really? Show me where in the bill does it say you will be thrown in jail for not having insurance. Put up or shut up.

  13. kababayanC2 says:

    @dominojoey
    “Come …

    @dominojoey
    “Come on guys…what the f*** is wrong with you all? Do you really think we have the best health care system? Yeah if only you’re the CEO of a health insurance company. Stupid f****! Times are changing, and those that don’t want to come with us are still coming and you to will prosper

    But should we be thrown in prison for not buying something we can’t afford or don’t want???

  14. kababayanC2 says:

    @kubush Were your …
    @kubush Were your eyes shut during the video?! It’s CLEARLY stated there in the video the part of the Hcare bill that stated you would be fined or thrown in jail!

  15. TheTracker11rt says:

    Communism sure is …
    Communism sure is here.

    Most Americans are retarded TV-watchers. I mean to not offend or make fun of retarded people. I actually think United Statesians are retarded. This comes from drugs, alcohol, tobacco, and media (tv, radio, film, newspapers, magazines).

  16. ulpdy0 says:

    ••Medicare and …
    ••Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 44 years to get it right and they are broke.
    •Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 39 years to get it right and it is broke.
    •The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 billion a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 32 years to get it right and it is an abysmal failure

  17. octoberborn79 says:

    LESS FREEDOM IS …
    LESS FREEDOM IS RIGHT!!!!(so what are you in for for??oh,i didnt pay for my forced health insurance.)WHAT THE IS GOING ON IN THIS COUNTRY???

  18. dapoedog says:

    when u gonna stand …
    when u gonna stand up and fight

  19. dkrustyklown says:

    You miss option #3, …
    You miss option #3, that I am an agitator encouraging people to take decisive direct action against encroaching governmental tyranny.

    or option#4, that I’m using inflammatory rhetoric to polarize the discussion and encourage conflict.

    Or even a combination of 1, 3, & 4. I am not obligated to reveal my purpose.

    Live free or die!

  20. kubush says:

    So you’re either a …
    So you’re either a lunatic that is about to commite a crime or your just using inflammatory rhetoric for the shock factor. Either way, you’re an idiot.

  21. dkrustyklown says:

    That’s for me to …
    That’s for me to know and you to find out.

  22. kubush says:

    So your words are …
    So your words are empty with no intent?

  23. dkrustyklown says:

    For a threat to be …
    For a threat to be “illegal”, it has to be “specific” and “imminent”. I threatened no one. Who did I threaten? Name the person that I specifically threatened. You can’t? Of course not, because I didn’t threaten anyone.

    Is “declaring” war upon your own government illegal? No, it isn’t. “Waging” war is illegal. “Declaring” war is most certainly not. Only ACTIONS are considered treason. Expressing will, desire, and intent are most certainly not treason as per established CASE LAW.

  24. kubush says:

    You threatened …
    You threatened violence and declared war therefore you past the bounds of sedition.

    I have not uttered a single insult at your inane rambling and yet you choose to use words such as “stupid, fag, idiot, etc” If you can’t handle a debate in a mature manner then dont have one.

  25. dkrustyklown says:

    It doesn’t just …
    It doesn’t just state “…without regard to census”…it states, “without regard to census OR enumeration”. It shows your unabashed political bias in how you read the Constitution. You pick and choose that which you want to accept and ignore those bits which you don’t find convenient.

    Enumeration: to list, to number.

    As per the 16th amendment, the federal government can’t enumerate a list of people that are subject to a special income tax. That is precisely what the health reform bill does.

Leave a Reply